home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1995-02-27 | 29.6 KB | 1,022 lines |
- ORDER LIST
-
- MONDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1995
-
-
- CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
- 94-1170 JOHNSON, ARTHUR, ETC., ET AL V. AMERICAN AIRLINES, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, for further
-
- consideration in light of American Airlines, Inc. v.
-
- Wolens, 513 U. S. (1995).
-
- 94-6308 ROBINSON, MAURICE V. ARVONIO, SUPT., ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
-
- remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the
-
- Third Circuit for further consideration in light of
-
- O'Neal v. McAninch, 513 U. S. (1995).
-
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
- No. EDWARD H. WHEELER V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
-
- without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner
-
- is denied.
-
- D-1461 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID MICHAEL WEINFELD
-
- It having been reported to the Court that David
-
- Michael Weinfeld, of Meadowbrook, Pennsylvania, has
-
- been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme
-
- Court of Pennsylvania and this Court by order of
-
- October 11, 1994, having suspended the said David
-
- Michael Weinfeld from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said David Michael Weinfeld
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1468 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF A. DAVID LAUDANI
-
- It having been reported to the Court that A. David
-
- Laudani, of Eastpointe, Michigan, has been suspended
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of
-
- Michigan and this Court by order of November 14, 1994,
-
- having suspended the said A. David Laudani from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said A. David Laudani be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1470 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ANDREW JOSEPH ROCKER
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Andrew
-
- Joseph Rocker, of Cambridge, Ohio, has been suspended
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Ohio
-
- and this Court by order of December 5, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said Andrew Joseph Rocker from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Andrew Joseph Rocker be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1471 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PETER L. NILES
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Peter L.
-
- Niles, of Daytona Beach, Florida, has been suspended
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Florida
-
- and this Court by order of December 5, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said Peter L. Niles from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Peter L. Niles be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1472 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS P. CULLEN, JR.
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Thomas P.
-
- Cullen, Jr., of Woodside, New York, has resigned from
-
- the practice of law before the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department,
-
- and this Court by order of December 5, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said Thomas P. Cullen, Jr., from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Thomas P. Cullen, Jr.,
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1473 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LEE HAROLD BOSTIC
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Lee
-
- Harold Bostic, of Jamaica, New York, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department,
-
- and this Court by order of December 12, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said Lee Harold Bostic from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Lee Harold Bostic be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1474 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES PATRICK MURPHY
-
- It having been reported to the Court that James
-
- Patrick Murphy, of Houston, Texas, has been suspended
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas
-
- and this Court by order of December 5, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said James Patrick Murphy from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said James Patrick Murphy be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1475 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES G. KINCAID
-
- It having been reported to the Court that James G.
-
- Kincaid, of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Florida
-
- and this Court by order of December 5, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said James G. Kincaid from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said James G. Kincaid be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1476 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BRIAN PETER GIBBES
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Brian
-
- Peter Gibbes, of Hilton Head, South Carolina, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of South Carolina and this Court by order of December 5,
-
- 1994, having suspended the said Brian Peter Gibbes from
-
- the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
-
- rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
-
- be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Brian Peter Gibbes be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1477 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF REUBEN SAMUEL DAWKINS
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Reuben
-
- Samuel Dawkins, of Boston, Massachusetts, has been
-
- suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme
-
- Judicial Court of Massachusetts and this Court by order
-
- of December 5, 1994, having suspended the said Reuben
-
- Samuel Dawkins from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Reuben Samuel Dawkins
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
-
-
- D-1479 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HAROLD T. KING
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Harold T.
-
- King, of Bridgehampton, New York, has resigned from the
-
- practice of law before the Appellate Division, Supreme
-
- Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, and this
-
- Court by order of December 5, 1994, having suspended the
-
- said Harold T. King from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Harold T. King be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1482 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT CLYDE KNIGHT
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Robert
-
- Clyde Knight, of Darien, Wisconsin, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of
-
- Wisconsin and this Court by order of December 5, 1994,
-
- having suspended the said Robert Clyde Knight from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Robert Clyde Knight be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1483 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF VOLNEY FREDERICK MORIN, JR.
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Volney
-
- Frederick Morin, Jr., of Ashland, Oregon, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Oregon and this Court by order of December 5, 1994,
-
- having suspended the said Volney Frederick Morin, Jr.,
-
- from the practice of law in this Court and directed that
-
- a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Volney Frederick Morin,
-
- Jr., be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1484 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DONALD SCOTT ALTSCHUL
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Donald
-
- Scott Altschul, of San Francisco, California, has
-
- resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme
-
- Court of California and this Court by order of December
-
- 12, 1994, having suspended the said Donald Scott
-
- Altschul from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause
-
- why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Donald Scott Altschul
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1505 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROGER BEITLER
-
- It is ordered that Roger Beitler, of Sun City,
-
- California, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1510 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN E. WATSON
-
- It is ordered that John E. Watson, of St.
-
- Petersburg, Florida, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
-
-
- D-1511 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF J. JERRY ZELTZER
-
- It is ordered that J. Jerry Zeltzer, of Miami
-
- Beach, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1512 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF KENNETH ANTHONY PELS
-
- It is ordered that Kenneth Anthony Pels, of
-
- Washington, D.C., be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1513 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STANLEY POLANSKY
-
- It is ordered that Stanley Polansky, of Babylon,
-
- New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1514 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LAWRENCE MAZER
-
- It is ordered that Lawrence Mazer, of Philadelphia,
-
- Pennsylvania, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1515 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT F. SIMONE
-
- It is ordered that Robert F. Simone, of
-
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, be suspended from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue,
-
- returnable within forty days, requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice
-
- of law in this Court.
-
- D-1516 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL GAYHART KENT
-
- It is ordered that Michael Gayhart Kent, of
-
- Huntingtown, Maryland, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1517 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LEON EGGLESTON PROVINE
-
- It is ordered that Leon Eggleston Provine, of
-
- Grenada, Mississippi, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1518 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EMILE E. GOUIRAN
-
- It is ordered that Emile E. Gouiran, of Paris,
-
- France, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
-
-
- 94-7636 IN RE MARIA L. C. GAYDOS
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is
-
- allowed until March 20, 1995, within which to pay the
-
- docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a
-
- petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this
-
- Court.
-
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI GRANTED
-
- 94-1139 GEICO, ET AL. V. DUANE, VINCENT
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI DENIED
-
- 93-9434 McGAHEE, EARL J. V. ALABAMA
-
- 94-847 WEXLER, VICTOR V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-852 CIR V. BAPTISTE, GABRIEL
-
- 94-989 SAM BROWN CO. V. JACOBS MFG. CO.
-
- 94-1002 ZAIA, NEERAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-1010 NATL. UNION FIRE INS. CO. V. CNA INS. COS., ET AL.
-
- 94-1012 MANVILLE SALES CORP., ET AL. V. EEOC, ET AL.
-
- 94-1026 MERRIAM-WEBSTER, INC. V. RANDOM HOUSE, INC.
-
- 94-1048 ) NFL, ET AL. V. SULLIVAN, WILLIAM
- )
- 94-1206 ) SULLIVAN, WILLIAM V. NFL, ET AL.
-
- 94-1070 GE CO., ET AL. V. INGRAM, PATRICIA, ET AL.
-
- 94-1147 VIDEO VISIONS, INC., ET AL. V. KONSTAM, DIR. OF LAW, ETC.
-
- 94-1148 HUPPELER, ROBERT, ET AL. V. OSCAR MAYER FOODS, ET AL.
-
- 94-1166 SCARFIA, MICHAEL V. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
-
- 94-1167 KACHINA PLYWOOD, ET AL. V. HURT, NORMA
-
- 94-1172 SKYLINE LODGE, INC. V. DELANEY, PHYLLIS, ET AL.
-
- 94-1178 SULTENFUSS, STEPHEN V. SNOW, WAYNE, ET AL.
-
- 94-1180 HARBOLD, RALPH V. ILLINOIS
-
- 94-1181 STARNES, WILLIAM V. CAPITAL CITIES MEDIA, ET AL.
-
- 94-1184 NOVATEL COMPUTER SYSTEMS V. CRAY COMMUNICATIONS, ETC.
-
- 94-1185 CHANUTE, KS, ET AL. V. WILLIAMS NATURAL GAS CO.
-
- 94-1189 ROSENBAUM, JEAN V. ROSENBAUM, KURT
-
- 94-1190 FISHER, STEPHEN V. FITT, BENJAMIN, ET AL.
-
- 94-1192 JENKINS, LYNN V. WEIS, ELAINE
-
- 94-1193 THOMURE, ANDREW V. PHILLIPS FURNITURE, ET AL.
-
- 94-1194 SARDY, JOHN V. HODGE, LATRELLE
-
- 94-1197 DAVIS, LLOYD V. ILLINOIS
-
- 94-1198 DREKSLER, DIANE V. ILLINOIS
-
- 94-1199 ZISK, WILLIAM V. HIGH STREET ASSOCIATES
-
- 94-1201 BLANKENBURG, KARL, ET AL. V. CORBIN, GARY, ETC.
-
- 94-1232 OHIO SAVINGS BANK V. ESTATE OF JOAN POPP
-
- 94-1265 WOLVERINE, LTD., ET AL. V. CIR
-
- 94-1274 MARTINSON, EDWARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-1275 NATIONALIST MOVEMENT V. CIR
-
- 94-1279 McELROY, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-1282 WARD, BENNIE V. UNIV. OF TENN., ET AL.
-
- 94-6175 EMERY, JEFF V. TEXAS
-
- 94-6460 WARD, THOMAS LEE V. WHITLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 94-6612 JAMES, JUDY V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL
-
- 94-7020 DANDRIDGE, FRED V. LOCKHART, DIR. AR DOC
-
- 94-7092 VANTERPOOL, CRAIG A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7119 WEEKS, VARNALL V. JONES, WARDEN
-
- 94-7122 SALCIDO, BENJAMIN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7136 HUFFSTETLER, DAVID E. V. FRENCH, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 94-7142 PEREZ, JOSE H. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7147 RUTLEDGE, JIMMY L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7419 GUTIERREZ, LUIS A. V. TOOMBS, WARDEN
-
- 94-7494 MUSGRAVE, BOBBY W. V. WELBORN, WARDEN
-
- 94-7505 SLOAN, KEVIN V. WILKINSON, REGINALD A.
-
- 94-7507 PARISH, CHRISTOPHER V. MISSISSIPPI
-
- 94-7509 PIZZO, DREW MICHAEL V. WHITLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 94-7512 SATCHER, MICHAEL CHARLES V. NETHERLAND, WARDEN
-
- 94-7514 SNYDER, ROBERT MELVIN V. GROOSE, SUPT., ET AL.
-
- 94-7517 NICHOLAS, DUANE V. WRIGHT, SUPT., CLALLAM BAY
-
- 94-7520 MUHAMMAD, HASSAN K. V. HAWLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 94-7523 BROOKINGS, DONALD V. SINGLETARY, SEC.
-
- 94-7528 DIXON, DENNIS V. NORRIS, DIR., AR DOC
-
- 94-7536 CARTER, KENNY V. APP. DIV., SUPREME CT. OF NY
-
- 94-7537 MAYES, WILLIAM R. V. OKLAHOMA
-
- 94-7542 CHAMBERS, GREGORY LEE V. ILLINOIS
-
- 94-7543 JACKSON, VELMA V. ROCHESTER HOUSING AUTHORITY
-
- 94-7545 BOND, CARL D. V. FLORIDA
-
- 94-7551 COOPER, OWEN LAMAR V. RIGGS, FRANK, ET AL.
-
- 94-7556 SPENCER, DANIEL V. GROOSE, SUPT., JEFFERSON CITY
-
- 94-7558 PLEDGER, NARVELLE V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 94-7567 BROOKS, LONIE V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
-
- 94-7571 SLAVIN, FRANCINE V. NEW YORK
-
- 94-7592 OLLIE, JOSEPH V. ROSEMEYER, SUPT., GREENSBURG
-
- 94-7593 WATKINS, KEVIN V. DiPAOLO, SUPT., MA
-
- 94-7594 BLAMEUSER, WILLIAM J. V. ILLINOIS
-
- 94-7596 JOHNSTON, DAVID E. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
-
- 94-7597 AYERS, NORMAN ALLEN V. SMITH, WILLIAM, ET AL.
-
- 94-7608 LUTON, DELORES V. GRANDISON, SUPERINTENDENT
-
- 94-7615 McGUIRE, JAMES V. SCHIRO, DIR., MO DOC, ET AL.
-
- 94-7616 DIAZ, CARLOS V. McCLELLAN, SUPT., SOUTHPORT
-
- 94-7617 GUMPL, STEPHEN V. WILKINSON, REGINALD, ET AL.
-
- 94-7640 VEY, EILEEN V. COLVILLE, ROBERT E., ET AL.
-
- 94-7700 KEYS, BOBBY E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7722 HARRIS, GLENN D. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 94-7740 RISHOR, KIRK V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7741 SCOTT, CHRISTOPHER V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7757 ) QUINTERO, MELBA V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 94-7787 ) RODRIGUEZ, MARIA V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 94-7848 ) GONZALEZ, SANTIAGO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7758 CUNNINGHAM, LAWRENCE V. RUBIN, SEC. OF TREASURY
-
- 94-7759 JEFFERY, ADAM J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7761 JEFFERSON, ALDONSO M. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7762 McMANUS, MICHAEL A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7763 JACKSON, GRADY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7766 MORRELL, ROGER M. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7767 LOWERY, ERIC V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7769 JEFFRIES, QUINTIN D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7771 McCRAY, WILLIAM T. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7772 LONGSTREET, ANTHONY O. V. USDC SD IL
-
- 94-7773 McQUEEN, CALVIN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7775 McNAIR, BISHOP H. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7780 ESPINOZA-PADILLA, MARIO C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7781 HUFF, HENRY L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7783 OGUNGBE, ADEDAMOLA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7784 ROGERS, LYNNE VICTORIA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7792 CALVERLEY, TIMOTHY LYNN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7793 CLEMONS, KENNETH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7795 CURTIS, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7798 COLEMAN, LEWELLIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7805 WILSON, LANCE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7806 WILDER, TERRY A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7807 WILLIAMS, DAVID L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7809 THORNTON, GEORGE J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7817 LOMASK, SANFORD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7828 THOMPSON, DANIEL G. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7829 TROTTER, DAVID A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7835 ROBINSON, WYNN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7837 BENITEZ, GEORGE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7838 JEANES, CLEVELAND V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7841 RONEY, MAURICE VINCENT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7842 STAUDT, DAVID V. WISCONSIN
-
- 94-7843 FILLMORE, WILLIE E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7845 ROSALES, RAUL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7847 HARRIS, ALAN D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7849 HARRIS, ALVIN T. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7865 BAILEY, MIKE LEE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7866 CARBALLO-MENENDEZ, MAGLORIA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7868 KREUTZER, JAMES G. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-7876 KEEL, JOSEPH T. V. NORTH CAROLINA
-
- 94-7879 VIOLA, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 93-1098 OUTBOARD MARINE CORP. V. WOLTERING, DAVID
-
- The motion of National Marine Manufacturer's
-
- Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae
-
- is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is
-
- denied.
-
- 94-981 O & G SPRING & WIRE, ETC. V. EEOC
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to amend or
-
- clarify the petition for a writ of certiorari is
-
- granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is
-
- denied.
-
- 94-1188 AM. PRESIDENT LINES, ET AL. V. GAMMA-10 PLASTICS, INC.
-
- The motion of Assuranceforeningen Skuld, et al. for
-
- leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The
-
- petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 94-7552 COOPER, JOYCE V. NATIONAL RX SERVICES
-
- 94-7657 LINEHAN, DENIS M. V. HARVARD UNIV.
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or
-
- decision of these petitions.
-
-
-
- HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
-
- 94-7917 IN RE TOMMY LYNN BRANCH
-
- The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.
-
-
-
- MANDAMUS DENIED
-
- 94-7574 IN RE REUBEN WILLIAMS
-
- 94-7598 IN RE BOBBIE L. ADAMS
-
- The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
-
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
- 93-8730 GILES, ARTHUR L. V. ALABAMA
-
- 94-662 HENDERSON, CA, ET AL. V. NV ENTERTAINMENT, ET AL.
-
- 94-803 KNIGHTEN, LESLIE V. CAVE & McKAY, ET AL.
-
- 94-5747 LEDFORD, J. W. V. GEORGIA
-
- 94-6038 WILKERSON, ROBERT V. WHITLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 94-6112 FORD, DANIEL L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-6415 QUEEN, TIMOTHY H. V. TEXAS
-
- 94-6479 MIKKILINENI, M. R. V. AMWEST SURETY INSURANCE CO.
-
- 94-6480 MIKKILINENI, M. R. V. FOREST HILLS
-
- 94-6661 HUTTO, ANGELA G. V. NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES
-
- 94-6692 DOE, JOHN V. IOWA, ET AL.
-
- 94-6747 SIMONSON, MATTHEW V. SIMONSON, ROSEMARY
-
- 94-6783 KISKILA, RONAL, ET UX. V. BUSINESS EXCHANGE, ET AL.
-
- 94-6841 WITCHER, PHYLLIS V. WITCHER, MURRAY
-
- 94-6863 CASSIDY, BERNARD J. V. INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY CO.
-
- 94-6870 WILLIAMS, CLAUDE V. USPS, ET AL.
-
- 94-6928 LEAPHART, CLARENCE I. V. CIR
-
- 94-7019 WISHON, DOROTHY V. FL DEPT OF HEALTH AND REHAB.
-
- 94-7046 ANDERSON, GLENN F. V. DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
-
-
-
- RECESS ORDER
-
- The Court will take a recess from Monday,
-
- March 6, 1995, until Monday, March 20, 1995.
-
-
-
- MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
-
- The written motions for admission of the following
-
- lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
-
-